3 ms·
Yes. Morning meetings to see where everyone is at vs yesterday, brainstorm any issues, and declare what they're working on. Then go solo all day.
by contingencies 4y ago
Yes. Morning meetings to see where everyone is at vs yesterday, brainstorm any issues, and declare what they're working on. Then go solo all day.
- thevagrant 4y agoMorning meetings are the worst. I'd much prefer mid afternoon meetings. I can wake up, get to work, minimal interuptions and then be confident of where I'm at by mid afternoon.
- Moissanite 4y agoMid afternoon meetings are terrible for me; I never feel like I can really settle into a difficult task unless I know that I have the option to make it the last thing I'm doing that day. As soon as I have something scheduled between 1 and 4, that day becomes a write-off and I try to fill it with other meetings and smaller, less consequential tasks. If I could start each day with 2-3 short meetings then have the rest of the day available to get something actionable done, both me and my employer would be much better off.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Jeremy1026 4y agoThis is why the team needs to determine their meeting cadence as a team. I'd prefer morning meetings, get them out of the way and let me get to work like the person you replied to. Different people have different preferences, getting a meeting cadence that works best for the majority of the team is going to result in the best results possible.
- qikInNdOutReply 4y agoMeetings should have a shared condition, as in everyone should either have something to share, or be a reciever of information. The set of all people in the graph meet, and the topics are handled by largest group getting info and being done with the exchange. Which also means, yes, half the group can get up mid meeting, and the remainder can fall apart into two seperat meetings.
- contingencies 4y agoIf it's well run it usually takes less than 10 minutes per pizza team.