No, you are right. that in fact happened, and the insurance company set the new premium based on imperics not emotions. my point is, that the "insurance premiu

No, you are right. that in fact happened, and the insurance company set the new premium based on imperics not emotions. my point is, that the "insurance premiums" we have to pay now are significantly higher because we did not employ nuclear on a larger scale 50 years ago. to stay in analogy: you had the choice of choosing another piping system that would have decreased your insurance premiums, but didn't based on an motional response. what we forget to factor in is the enormous tax we have to pay now and the coming years due to the decision of not employing nuclear: infrastructure to manage higher water levels. climate migration issues, energy dependency issues, you name it. and that tax we have to pay due to an emotional response.