I disagree to some extent that we should not change things just because we can: we grow beautiful ornamental gardens and weave silk and make cheese because thes

I disagree to some extent that we should not change things just because we can: we grow beautiful ornamental gardens and weave silk and make cheese because these things please us and not necessarily because we need them; nature would never produce such order. We are the masters of our world. Nature, too, has merit, but nature makes flood and famine and disease -- we can engineer against those things. Money is an instrument of labor also; it's possible to be rich, carbon negative, and without using up any depletable resources. In fact, more efficiency (less resources used to produce a good) means more profit, doesn't it? Money is the only reason a lot of endangered species are still alive. Here, rats eat ground-nesting bird eggs. Only money to build fences and island sanctuaries and establish breeding programs saved them.