>That's because you can't find an artist for a generated picture other than the ones in the training set. If you can't find a new artist, then the picture belon

>That's because you can't find an artist for a generated picture other than the ones in the training set. If you can't find a new artist, then the picture belongs to the old ones, so to speak We have some countries where it is explicitly legal to train AI models on copyrighted data without consent, and precedent in the US that makes this a plausible outcome there as well. Could you explain what portion of copyright law you believe would cover this argument? I'm not a lawyer, but have a passing familiarity with US copyright law, and in it, at least, I do not know of anything that would support the idea you're proposing here. How would you even assign copyright to the "old" artists? How are you going to determine what percentage of any given generation was influenced by artists X, Y, Z?