It seems to me more like a request for an argument of such strength that, if I can find a weakness in it, I can be confident in the falseness of the conclusion

It seems to me more like a request for an argument of such strength that, if I can find a weakness in it, I can be confident in the falseness of the conclusion without doing any further research to see if that weakness has been buttressed elsewhere in the literature. It seems like it would therefore need to be a living document, actively maintained and updated, sort of like the IPCC reports. And probably at least 100 pages long. In which case, that's basically the website Less Wrong? But most people want something condensed, in exactly the way that addresses their specific doubts without any of the other stuff they don't care about.