> "What's the academically supported description/ argument or whatever for why nuclear weapons are dangerous for the world if they exist?" The Wikipedia articl

> "What's the academically supported description/ argument or whatever for why nuclear weapons are dangerous for the world if they exist?" The Wikipedia article on mutual assured destruction (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction) traces the origin and evolution of exactly that analysis, including even pre-atom bomb precursors based on earlier weapons that would hypothetically make war "too terrible to ever happen again".