2 ms·
The problem is that "the commitment to democracy" has long had huge disclaimers and asterisks next to it. If your democracy starts to get a bit frisky about na
by hakfoo 3y ago
The problem is that "the commitment to democracy" has long had huge disclaimers and asterisks next to it. If your democracy starts to get a bit frisky about nationalizing assets, suddenly it's going to become an "illegitimate regime" backed by "sham elections".
The US isn't a reliable supporter of anything but direct US interests, particularly in regards to private property. This means that it will always have a hard time having solid long-term relationships with peers of equal power, or maintaining respectful "we'll do X, you do Y" disagreements. We've gotten along with Europe and the English-speaking world because none of them really pose a significant challenge to the dance America calls. But we could barely make it through the length of WWII before deciding we couldn't coexist with the USSR.