3 ms·
This feels like it's too broad of a question to get a good answer in any short format, but I have previously seen and will paraphrase here a better question: .
by neovialogistics 4y ago
This feels like it's too broad of a question to get a good answer in any short format, but I have previously seen and will paraphrase here a better question:
.
Is there a canonical source for the argument that most of the probability space of entities that human civilization might:
(a) Qualify as AGI
(b) Cause to come into existence in the near future
corresponds to entities that would have both:
(i) goals involving the ruin of human civilization
(ii) the ability to carry out those goals?
.
This framing is better at inhibiting the people who lack significant math and/or ML knowledge from participating, which seems a priority for any public internet discussion about probability distributions over NNs and transformers.