This is just more non-sequiturs, with which you attempt to distract from the gaping hole in your position. You have still not shown any hint of any plausible th

This is just more non-sequiturs, with which you attempt to distract from the gaping hole in your position. You have still not shown any hint of any plausible threat, without which, it is not even close to, as you put it, "100% isomorphic to extortion" - in fact, you have not presented one iota of evidence of extortion, and evidence is a requirement for for prosecuting extortion crimes. And for your information, 'explicit' is not a synonym of 'credible'.