3 ms·
> Notice that you are also taking the author at his word when you say he literally compromised live systems. Technically true. If this happened as described,
by ajross 4y ago
> Notice that you are also taking the author at his word when you say he literally compromised live systems.
Technically true. If this happened as described, it's criminal behavior. If he's lying, it's maybe not.
FWIW: explicit threats are not and never have been a requirement for prosecuting extortion crimes. I'm not sure where you are getting that.
- mannykannot 4y agoThis is just more non-sequiturs, with which you attempt to distract from the gaping hole in your position. You have still not shown any hint of any plausible threat, without which, it is not even close to, as you put it, "100% isomorphic to extortion" - in fact, you have not presented one iota of evidence of extortion, and evidence is a requirement for for prosecuting extortion crimes. And for your information, 'explicit' is not a synonym of 'credible'.