3 ms·
That was far less onerous than I expected.
by ThrowawayTestr 4y ago
That was far less onerous than I expected.
- DangitBobby 4y agoHaving to make 1 appointment is unacceptable, let alone 2.
- deathanatos 4y ago… especially because of the reason given. If your rules stipulate that on days upon which you accept money, you require a courier, and you schedule a meeting to accept money on that day … then you should have a courier on that day. It's not rocket science.
- bsder 4y agoReally? Multiple appointments and different people refusing to take the payment isn't onerous? Sure, it's fine for an economics professor who has lots of time and can take off in the middle of the day to schedule and then drive and then get rescheduled and then ... This is hell on Earth for someone who works hourly from 9 to 5. And it's absolutely stupid. Either banks should be authorized to take such payments or the post office should be authorized to take such payments.