What kind of Stockholm Syndrome is required for a user to believe that a transition from "bug-compatible with FIPS-certified stable releases" to "no-promises be

What kind of Stockholm Syndrome is required for a user to believe that a transition from "bug-compatible with FIPS-certified stable releases" to "no-promises best-effort ABI stability" is desireable because now we get to do our own tech support? I'll never in my life understand this. It's like Red Hat took the time they should have used to talk to their customers and spent it writing a Guide To Enjoying Eating Shit to lecture everyone about how great things are now. I'd respect the company a lot more if they just said "we bought all this CentOS stuff and it turned out to be a money pit so we're throwing it out and making it a part of the beta testing process" instead of this relentless gaslighting that anyone on Earth wanted this.