4 ms·
Is it problematic? Certainly not for the employee. Surely there's about a 10-20 year span where this person is getting ahead due to factors that are external t
by MisterBastahrd 4y ago
Is it problematic? Certainly not for the employee.
Surely there's about a 10-20 year span where this person is getting ahead due to factors that are external to their work before age starts to take its toll on their looks. A bald, average-looking, overweight man and a slim, attractive man with a full head of hair with the exact same production will not be treated the same in most companies. Of the two, the more attractive guy will be seen as management material. A future face of the company. So they will get promoted first. And once they get ahead, they're not giving that lead up, because these comparisons will happen again and again at leach level.
And the Theranos woman? Her connections got her the fame she needed, and she then relied on cultish tropes to trick folks into giving her money. Even with hours in a makeup chair, she's barely even attractive at all.
- DoreenMichele 4y agoLast November, Holmes was sentenced to more than 11 years in prison. Probably not the outcome she was shooting for when she dropped out of college at age 19 to start her own company.
- theodric 4y ago> she's barely even attractive at all To each their own, I suppose. I thought she was cute.
- MisterBastahrd 4y agoWell, I'm not giving bonus points for blonde hair and pale skin, and otherwise she's got a completely average bone structure and facial features on the verge of having chipmunk cheeks. I just can't see how someone who looks that plain would be able to coerce people to invest in her company based on her attractiveness.