3 ms·
This is so badly written. Seems to exist mostly to plug that mini cabinet. Here's a much better one from 10 years ago: https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-o
by Luc 4y ago
This is so badly written. Seems to exist mostly to plug that mini cabinet.
Here's a much better one from 10 years ago:
https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/the-space-invader https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/the-spac...
- justin66 4y agoIt's fine that you like that other article better, but there's nothing "so badly written" about this newer one (what a vapid, lazy critique). Every bit of history that can be recorded from someone like Tomohiro Nishikado, even if it's not that much, matters.
- autoexec 4y agoThe article here is an ad. I guess it's not a badly written advertisement, but it still reads as an advertisement which isn't exactly a desirable trait in an article.
- morelisp 4y agoNishikado has been interviewed dozens of not hundreds of times about this same topic since the 90s. There’s nothing new in this article, it’s missing a lot that’s in most others, plus it’s at least half ad.
- gpvos 4y agoIt's the first one I've seen, and I was happy to find it here.
- bookofjoe 4y agohttps://archive.ph/UoHzG https://archive.ph/UoHzG