3 ms·
I suppose it was. But well clearly halting nuclear expansion was a higher priority so even if they didn't say it directly, they implicitly support increased rel
by qwytw 4y ago
I suppose it was. But well clearly halting nuclear expansion was a higher priority so even if they didn't say it directly, they implicitly support increased reliance on fossil fuels which is what matters.
- RandomLensman 4y agoIf you believe only climate related pollution matters - yes.
- qwytw 4y agoNo, not at all. Why would you even say that? Actually the opposite at least where coal is concerned per kWh it emits "only" 2x more CO2 but (according to estimates) causes 10x more deaths than natural gas. 20-30 thousand people die every year due to pollution from coal power plants in the EU alone. That's basically 2 to 8 "free" Chernobyls every single year...
- RandomLensman 4y agoBecause you seem to have not looked at the policies of the German greens in the 1980s and the pollution landscape of the time.