4 ms·
In the pdf article, the submitted title was in fact the subtitle. I can see an argument for choosing the subtitle like that when an article has the form Pithy
by version_five 3y ago
In the pdf article, the submitted title was in fact the subtitle. I can see an argument for choosing the subtitle like that when an article has the form
Pithy phrase: subtitle that actually tells you something
- anigbrowl 3y agoEspecially given the lamentable academic fad for such titles, a la Stupid is good: capturing unwary readers' attention by exploiting incongruity'.
- dang 3y agoYup we often do that when the original title is inadequate (e.g. too baity or misleading). But the original title was fine here!