3 ms·
I've messed about with that sort of thing before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe4UAmb2wJw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe4UAmb2wJw. I never got that far
by yarg 4y ago
I've messed about with that sort of thing before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe4UAmb2wJw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe4UAmb2wJw.
I never got that far - I was primarily considering it as a point location definition for an image format, and I wanted a symmetrical curve.
You can actually do that, if you relax the constraint that no grid point is shared (it's not really that big a problem, you just need to base the transform on the location between pixels, and not the centres of the pixels).
- EntrePrescott 4y agointeresting. Here's another video where one sees how the precision of this Moore curve drawn with epicycles varies with the frequency range: https://old.reddit.com/r/woahdude/comments/6udj3e/moore_curve_drawn_with_epicycles/ https://old.reddit.com/r/woahdude/comments/6udj3e/moore_curv...
- yarg 4y agoHe's using a different sample set than I did, I only used the centre pixel points, but (I believe) he has also included points in between. Hence his version retains the blockiness of the Moore curve, whereas mine does not.