> has far cheaper renewables in cost per kwh Currently yes. In the 80s and 90s not so much. It's huge a tragedy nuclear expansion stopped back then because nu

> has far cheaper renewables in cost per kwh Currently yes. In the 80s and 90s not so much. It's huge a tragedy nuclear expansion stopped back then because nuclear was very cheap if we factor the indirect costs from burning fossil fuels (specifically premature deaths and other healthcare issues due to pollution. We basically get 2 to 8 free Chernobyls every year just by burning coal in the EU alone. Stopping climate change would just have been a free bonus).