2 ms·
> Unfortunately this is not the case, decommissioning for example is extremely expensive though can be deferred for years. Well then closing plants makes even
by ClumsyPilot 4y ago
> Unfortunately this is not the case, decommissioning for example is extremely expensive though can be deferred for years.
Well then closing plants makes even less sence, youll have to decomission them sooner
- Retric 4y agoI wouldn’t be sure of that. As I understand it, nuclear power plants are limited by corrosion so the end date for decommissioning is likely based on the power plants construction date not its final date of operation. There’s regulations that lost decommissioning must finish within 60 years of shutdown, but that stuff is often flexible in practice where physics isn’t.