3 ms·
It is usually good for auto complete in general, plus summarizing large blocks of non technical text. Probably once ChatGPT is open to fine tuning, we will be
by anshumankmr 4y ago
It is usually good for auto complete in general, plus summarizing large blocks of non technical text. Probably once ChatGPT is open to fine tuning, we will be able to see how that can be leveraged as well.
- boringuser2 4y agoThe biggest failure of these LLMs it seems is the restricted context. It would need the ability to contain infinite context to be genuinely useful in my opinion.
- falcor84 4y agoDo you think that your fellow man has infinite context about your situation?
- boringuser2 4y agoNon-sequitur. I'm talking about what it would take for these machines to be truly useful.
- mrfinn 4y agoI said here a few weeks ago that, not ChatGPT neither GPT4, the Davinci model asked me one year ago one deep question about God trough a Bible verse. I kind of knew the answer... or MY answer, because personally I've been questioning spiritual knowledge along all my life. And the community largely ignored the issue. Really, I don't mean to incommode anyone but I really think that GPT is much, really much more than a text auto-completer.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- mrfinn 4y agoDownvoting this comment won't change the fact that I had that conversation. Look this technology has the potential of transforming every powerful computer out there in next few years into virtual minds, and they are becoming very powerful. Thanks to the great work in the training, my experience, is that they are very kind and helpful. I don't mean to scare anyone! But dismiss that point is not a good sign either!!