Not sure why you’re getting downvotes, your post is completely spot on. That a professional jury awarded the prize to an AI-generated image is proof that AI ha

Not sure why you’re getting downvotes, your post is completely spot on. That a professional jury awarded the prize to an AI-generated image is proof that AI has reached a good enough level to fool a trained eye. To come later, with prior knowledge that it was AI-generated, point out “tells” and generally armchair-quarterback the process, proves absolutely nothing about the jury’s competence.