3 ms·

It was "suppressed" because it's malodorous garbage.

• johnklos 3y ago
  It's interesting that nobody here seems to refute any of the assertions and would rather hand-wave.
  • caconym_ 3y ago
    Why bother when the source has previously shown itself to be biased and unreliable? That's what happens when you pretend to be a journalist without applying journalistic standards: people will stop taking you seriously, and with good reason. As an aside, I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but it's interesting how many comments in this thread read like they were written by ESG Hound him(?)self.
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
• brookst 3y ago
  Funny, usually HN comments reply to factually incorrect articles with well informed rebuttals rather than just shouting them down and insulting everyone.
  • Karunamon 3y ago
    Those people tend to comment on substantive articles not written by people with a history of emotionally laden axe grinding.