3 ms·
They could. They could also choose to not to. They could also have done it and their set of reasons doesn’t align with yours. They’re a private company. They c
by mynameisvlad 4y ago
They could. They could also choose to not to. They could also have done it and their set of reasons doesn’t align with yours.
They’re a private company. They can choose to do whatever they want or don’t want to.
If they don’t want to support JPEGXL, why should they be forced to do it? If it was such a necessary format, it would have been a competitive disadvantage to not have support and that would have forced their hand, but nobody else supports it either so why should Google be forced to if they (clearly) don’t want to.
- ksec 4y agoThey dont have to. But they could also not lie about it. Or lie about do no evil ( I know that is no longer their motto ). Or they could also not lie about WebP, AOM or AMP or everything else about being Good.
- mynameisvlad 4y agoI mean they could do all those things, but, once again, they don’t have to. They don’t have a responsibility to anyone but their shareholders and therefore bottom line.