3 ms·
No, instead Google should made WebP a proof-of-concept that there are technological advancements that can improve and made a successor of WebP like they've done
by zinekeller 4y ago
No, instead Google should made WebP a proof-of-concept that there are technological advancements that can improve and made a successor of WebP like they've done with QUIC (to HTTP 3), not force-slinging it to everyone. Also, WebP violates the "two independent implementations" standard - at least AVIF can be argued to have two different implementations (due to dav1d).