5 ms·
No. The objection to linking to sites with JS is that they contain nonfree JS blobs that spy on you, run unknown obfuscated code, and are not open to modificati
by chomp 3y ago
No. The objection to linking to sites with JS is that they contain nonfree JS blobs that spy on you, run unknown obfuscated code, and are not open to modification, because they’re almost always obfuscated.
- Eduard 3y agoStill silly, because whoever cares about that stance can just visit the site with (requests for) Javascript disabled.
- jraph 3y agoChromium bug tracker doesn't work with Javascript disabled.
- Eduard 3y agookay, I appreciate your reply. Even so, linking to the issue is helpful, including JavaScript disablers.
- jraph 3y agoSo do I with yours. I both understand the FSF not wanting to link to something that's not readable without running non-free code, and the wish to have the link anyway, at least for reference.