3 ms·
tl;dr: AVIF, HEIC and WEBP all handily beat JXL for the Minecraft and CSGO screenshot. From the article, minecraft.jxl is 545275 bytes. Using imagemagick[1] t
by zimpenfish 4y ago
tl;dr: AVIF, HEIC and WEBP all handily beat JXL for the Minecraft and CSGO screenshot.
From the article, minecraft.jxl is 545275 bytes.
Using imagemagick[1] to convert to various formats at 8bit depth:
191875 36.39% csgo.avif
288048 54.63% csgo.webp
349204 66.23% csgo.heic
507882 96.32% csgo-8bit.jxl
511727 97.05% csgo-85.jpg
527282 100.00% csgo.jxl
960946 182.25% csgo-95.jpg
3665475 695.16% csgo.png
183935 33.73% minecraft.avif
266890 48.95% minecraft.webp
358482 65.74% minecraft.heic
490623 89.98% minecraft-85.jpg
522250 95.78% minecraft-8bit.jxl
545275 100.00% minecraft.jxl
1047533 192.11% minecraft-95.jpg
3018052 553.49% minecraft.png
[1] Version: ImageMagick 7.1.1-6 Q16-HDRI aarch64 21020 https://imagemagick.org https://imagemagick.org
- zokier 4y agoYou can't just compare lossy image formats on size alone, you have to factor in image quality. All of the formats have one or more quality parameters that have huge impact on size/quality.
- Dalewyn 4y agoWhen it comes to computer screenshots, it's PNG or another lossless format or GTFO. Even moreso if the purpose is comparing image quality of the screenshots' contents. (No, I did not see those JPEG-XL images because Chromium laughs at it.[1]) [1]: https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/04/16/002204/fsf-says-googles-decision-to-deprecate-jpeg-xl-emphasizes-need-for-browser-choice https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/04/16/002204/fsf-says-goo...
- ksec 4y agoThis is coming from a 2009 account so I am guessing all these results have a similar score in quality testing? If so which metric did you measure it with?