4 ms·
I quite disagree with two ideas in this article: 1. For me until proven otherwise, RedHat have an OpenCore model, the CentOS shift is too recent to be meaningf
by Twisell 4y ago
I quite disagree with two ideas in this article:
1. For me until proven otherwise, RedHat have an OpenCore model, the CentOS shift is too recent to be meaningful. My company literally panicked about their CentOS servers because they didn't want a rolling distro and so decided to switch to something else free for low risk VM (worse I'm afraid) and pay RHEL support for critical applications.
2.There are a shitload of successful support company for real OpenSource product, the author just choose to ignore them. Maybe because they are mostly smaller and "uninvestable". Just look a the support advertised options for PostgreSQL in North-America only... https://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/northamerica/ https://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/nort...
- asddubs 4y agowhy didn't they just switch to rockylinux?
- Twisell 4y agoThey switched to Oracle Linux... and for the love of humankind don't ask me why... (At least they had the sense to switch to REHL for critical servers) Now on the app side we are left with some vendors that don't support installs on OracleLinux (because who would switch to that... again don't ask me why).
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]