3 ms·
That answer would be hard to validate here. It already has the necessary wireless-transmission feature. And if the feature weren't desired, why would it exist o
by ShadowBanThis01 4y ago
That answer would be hard to validate here. It already has the necessary wireless-transmission feature. And if the feature weren't desired, why would it exist on ANY drone?
Look up "cinewhoop" drones. DJI even makes a drone that addresses this market. It just doesn't have the image quality that this one does.
I'd say simply supporting an already-existing DJI video receiver is way more of an expected use case than carrying a drone around in your hands while filming.
- the__alchemist 4y ago> And if the feature weren't desired, why would it exist on ANY drone? Different market segments. To draw earlier on my analogy, loiter and automated flight exist in iNav, PX4, and Ardupilot. Are you the target market for this product? Do you plan to buy one? Have you talked to people who are? Do they want goggles support?
- ShadowBanThis01 4y agoYes, I am. If it supports goggles, I will most likely buy it. And I did get a response from B&H to a question about it today, saying that many customers have indeed inquired about this capability but there is no information from DJI about it yet. Here's the exact statement from B&H: "Unfortunately DJI has not provided further insight as to whether these two will be compatible. We hope they are, with a provided firmware update in some months, as customers have really desired another non-racing fpv headset." For what that's worth...