4 ms·
Got that part. I was just challenging your statement that they "would never actually become humans" with the fact that anything of the homo sapien species is h
by wensing 18y ago
Got that part.
I was just challenging your statement that they "would never actually become humans" with the fact that anything of the homo sapien species is human, which of course would include the embryos. Just like dog embryos are very young dogs, and cat embryos are very young cats. 'Embryo' is just one stage of a single line of development.
- lunchbox 18y agoOK. But this is quickly progressing into heavy moral/philosophical territory -- we should probably stop here.
- wensing 18y agoIt is definitely heavy. Can do.
- gjm11 18y agoThe trouble is that "human" is a very ambiguous word. If a "human" is a living organism made out of cells with DNA typical of humans, then certainly embryos are humans. If a "human" is a thinking, language-using, tool-using bipedal mammal, then certainly embryos are not humans (but neither are 3-month-old babies). There's nothing wrong with that ... except that most of us have strongly held beliefs about "humans", which don't necessarily come with precise definitions of "human" attached to them.