For what is worth, I agree all those things are emergent (how else would they come to be?), but also felt it was non sequitur and was put off by the assertion i

For what is worth, I agree all those things are emergent (how else would they come to be?), but also felt it was non sequitur and was put off by the assertion it was "too hot to handle." I think GP was objecting less to the substance of what you said than that it's non sequitur-ness, if I had to guess they viewed it at disrespectful because the original commenter had put a lot of effort into creating a thread on a certain topic and they perceived you were hijacking it to talk about something tangential. The connection between these topics may be clearer to you than it is to us. While I do know of some people who refuse to accept any form of fundamental relativism or uncertainty, I honestly think they're pretty rare, and it's unnecessarily confrontational to start a conversation asserting your views are "too hot to handle". It's sort of like asserting that some people are too dumb to agree with you - it's getting off on the wrong foot, and more likely to incite an argument than a discussion.