3 ms·

The 'commissioning' notion is how you wish to reduce the equation. I on the other hand consider AI as tool a reasonable proposition for the reasons noted. And f

• LegitShady 4y ago
  The commissioning notion was brought up by the copyright board in their march advisement on the eligibility of neural network produced works under copyright - which are not eligible. It's an accurate description of whats going on. Commissioning paintings until you get the one you want isn't artistic expression, or artistic decision making, and the human coming up with prompts will be replaced by a machine learning program trained on prompts, as they bring the least value to the process and are the most easily replaced. > And from a purely practical point of view, getting worked up over this is tilting at windmills. I'm not worked up at all. I'm explaining whats going on. Is anyone who thinks differently from you getting worked up? Are you getting worked up for imagining emotions I'm not experiencing? In the future just argue ideas instead of imagining emotions across internet mind reading. >Change is the constant. And there will be undoubtedly 'artist commissioners' that will outshine others, using the same 'artist'. It will all approach zero value, so it doesn't matter. It's inauthentic, uncopyrightable stuff based on the misappropriation of the work of actual artists. The expert 'commissioners' will also be replaced by machine learning faster than anyone else.