4 ms·

> It does confirm that Ukraine is losing the war badly, I think it was like 7 Ukrainians dying for 1 Russian. No: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/13/world/eur

> It does confirm that Ukraine is losing the war badly, I think it was like 7 Ukrainians dying for 1 Russian. No: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/13/world/europe/ukraine-russia-prisoners.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/13/world/europe/ukraine-russ... https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/03/14/did-the-ukrainian-army-kill-1100-russians-in-a-single-day-its-certainly-possible/?sh=157af7757b5c https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/03/14/did-the-ukr... https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-war-already-with-up-354000-casualties-likely-drag-us-documents-2023-04-12/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-war-already-wit... https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65260672 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65260672 https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/14/leaked-documents-russian-spetsnaz/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/14/... > With that knowledge What you call "knowledge" here is, in fact, just lies. It's interesting how susceptible people have become to falsehoods in the internet age. People get told what they want to hear and they believe it wholeheartedly, not matter how untrue it is.

ihatepython 4y ago
None of the sources you listed are credible.
- clouddrover 4y ago
  Sorry, but the factual world does not correspond to your fantasy world. You're going to have to grow up and learn to see the world beyond your computer screen. You've become internet siloed. It's rotting you.
- javajosh 4y ago
  Out of curiosity, what do you think credibility is? How do you think it is acquired? Do you think you have credibility? If so, why? Personally I don't find it odd that someone might reject "mainstream reality" as not credible. But what is odd are the things they often choose to replace it. E.g. 4chan ramblings or general internet randomness. It's like, be super skeptical, fine, but you don't get to be selective. You can't say the BBC is shit but forum22334.hackerville.ru is credible and be taken seriously.

ihatepython 4y ago

None of the sources you listed are credible.

clouddrover 4y ago
Sorry, but the factual world does not correspond to your fantasy world. You're going to have to grow up and learn to see the world beyond your computer screen. You've become internet siloed. It's rotting you.
javajosh 4y ago
Out of curiosity, what do you think credibility is? How do you think it is acquired? Do you think you have credibility? If so, why? Personally I don't find it odd that someone might reject "mainstream reality" as not credible. But what is odd are the things they often choose to replace it. E.g. 4chan ramblings or general internet randomness. It's like, be super skeptical, fine, but you don't get to be selective. You can't say the BBC is shit but forum22334.hackerville.ru is credible and be taken seriously.