3 ms·
As long as they have the renewable to offset generation capacity, it's all good. Nuclear is better than FF, but not without associated long-term burdens. (Trad
by 1letterunixname 4y ago
As long as they have the renewable to offset generation capacity, it's all good.
Nuclear is better than FF, but not without associated long-term burdens. (Trading nuclear for FFs would be dumb.)
The goal has to be to get off FF as fast as possible, with an emphasis on reducing imports.
- blibble 4y ago> As long as they have the renewable to offset generation capacity, it's all good. by keeping the nuclear for a few more years they could have phased out the coal instead and making it ever worse: that coal is lignite, the shittiest possible coal it's hard to overstate quite how stupid Germany is here