3 ms·

I kind of agree but I really don't see Tesla self-driving as even aspirational to AGI. It seems like the poster child for a domain specific AI that nobody has a

I kind of agree but I really don't see Tesla self-driving as even aspirational to AGI. It seems like the poster child for a domain specific AI that nobody has an interest in making general.

freediver 4y ago
Arguably you need AGI to drive from point a to point b in human conditions (not in controlled conditions)
- 93po 4y ago
  Arguably you need greater than human intelligence because humans mess this up and crash all the time
  - kaba0 4y ago
    Not due to lack of intelligence.
    - 93po 4y ago
      Not all the time, but often I would say it is.
      - brookst 4y ago
        Would be interesting to see data. My impression is that human crashes are predominately caused by errors like lack of attention, poor impulse control (speeding, tailgating, etc), and slow processing of surprises.
- brookst 4y ago
  Why does it need to be general? When would it need to write essays about the Romans, or determine novel gene functions, or do forensic accounting? AGI means it can do any task. I’m not seeing driving, as complicated as it is, as requiring truly general intelligence.