4 ms·
It’s much easier to put in a backdoor, or actually implement a small monitoring system, in a closed source operating system. That’s much harder with open sourc
by aborsy 4y ago
It’s much easier to put in a backdoor, or actually implement a small monitoring system, in a closed source operating system.
That’s much harder with open source software, not due to technical reasons, but because there is a good chance that eventually it will be discovered by some developer or security researcher. That will cause distrust of the government, and people going to defensive mode, making it much harder for governments to routinely hack into devices.
So, for example, the discovery of the flaw in the Debian random number generator had a huge impact. People who design security systems really pay attention to PRNGs nowadays (to the point that it seems weak PRNGs are no longer a significant concern in the mainstream desktop operating systems, though the issue obviously remains in IoT, virtual machines, HSMs etc).
Hiding the code for malware is common sense. That’s also why governments severely punish leaks these days.
- gls2ro 4y agoI think your logic stands when thinking about individuals or private organisations. But when thinking about state actors they almost have unlimited money/resources thus even if adding a backdoor is a bit harder on open source having unlimited money/resources makes it irrelevant. Where “unlimited” = to the size of the open source organisation that maintains a bit of software.