3 ms·

I think there are different people working on each issue. There's no collective "they" that has to split their focus. The microbiologists and epidemiologists th

• standardUser 3y ago
  The collective "they" I was referring to was society at large. The general public. But even among researchers working on solutions to these problems there certainly is a limited amount of resources to fund their research.
  • 399215728 3y ago
    I totally agree that the "general public" has "limited focus," especially since public health campaigns are hard! However, my claim is that a lot of progress on these issues doesn't need to be very public. Telling the public to do a thing sounds like the last step of the process, after researchers have already found a definitive solution. I also agree that researchers have a limited amount of resources! But I don't think that funding a research area is necessarily zero-sum. If a company or government decides to throw extra money to start researching a thing, research on other things doesn't stop. As an example, when the NSF provides more funding for research, the number of PhD students goes up, since there are more research grants to go around.