Hence my confusion with the title and the article at large. We know we need new particles if for nothing else than to explain dark matter (unless we will come w

Hence my confusion with the title and the article at large. We know we need new particles if for nothing else than to explain dark matter (unless we will come with a non-MOND non-matter theory that fits current observations and hopefully is compatible with other well tested theories too). We also have “known” for a while that the standard model is incomplete but so far actual physics beyond it has been eluding us. That was to me missing in this article.