5 ms·
>Actually not every way though.. nuclear waste has to go somewhere. I don't understand your argument; of course waste must go somewhere. Nuclear power, with it
by Nicksil 3y ago
>Actually not every way though.. nuclear waste has to go somewhere.
I don't understand your argument; of course waste must go somewhere. Nuclear power, with its waste, is still cleaner than fossil fuels in every way.
- DrBazza 3y ago> nuclear waste has to go somewhere. My stock comment for that is: bury it deep and with signs; if we've lost the ability to read the signs, we've lost the ability to dig deep and endanger ourselves.
- Nicksil 3y agoIndeed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_nuclear_waste_warning_messages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_nuclear_waste_warnin...
- benfortuna 3y agoI'm not saying nuclear is worse than fossil fuels, just that we don't know the future impact of waste with such a long half-life. So I don't think it's demonstrably cleaner "in every way".
- Nicksil 3y ago>I'm not saying nuclear is worse than fossil fuels, just that we don't know the future impact of waste with such a long half-life. No, we've got a pretty good idea. >So I don't think it's demonstrably cleaner "in every way". It is, objectively.