Thank you, that was illuminating. I was not in fact saying that good must always involve benefit and evil injury. It is obvious that acts which some will cate

Thank you, that was illuminating. I was not in fact saying that good must always involve benefit and evil injury. It is obvious that acts which some will categorise as evil can provide benefit, and vice versa. I was merely saying that there is no objective definition of good and evil independent of human judgement and people do differ in how they ascribe those labels.