> you can't convince me otherwise So? Are you trying to make this a poll? > deep learning is to achieve artificial intelligence, we had almost achieved DL ha

> you can't convince me otherwise So? Are you trying to make this a poll? > deep learning is to achieve artificial intelligence, we had almost achieved DL has already """achieved""" AI, which was there before the perceptron. In fact, "Artificial Intelligence" is there to solve problems without direct human work, and it has worked pretty well in the past decades in many different domains. This is to say, that our goal has been to have automated problem solvers - that of producing general intelligence (and, before that, general problem solvers) is kind of a different goal.