3 ms·
I have a solar setup. I’m fortunate that cleaning my panels is a matter of scrubbing them or taking my boat out when it’s raining. The article mentions the huge
by gabereiser 4y ago
I have a solar setup. I’m fortunate that cleaning my panels is a matter of scrubbing them or taking my boat out when it’s raining. The article mentions the huge solar installations in the deserts. This is the wrong approach and is wasteful. Society needs more solar pv generation where it’s being used. Lamp posts and stuff are a great example. Thinking about providing energy and thinking about huge power plants is old school coal/oil thinking. The sum of many smaller installations on roofs, window awnings, bus stops, walkways, train stations, schools, pretty much any building needs a solar power setup to sustain its needs. The bigger the building, the bigger the setup. Forget building huge farms in the desert. Build huge farms on the rooftops and save on transporting current. Just my observation. Energy companies don’t really care for energy independence. Why would they? It’s not in their interest.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- adrianN 4y agoHuge installations in very sunny places are cheaper because they benefit from economies of scale. Rooftops and lamp posts(!) are the most expensive type of solar installation.
- pcdoodle 4y agoLighting is a good example though. I believe under best case conditions you could get the battery and panels to last over 25 years if we reimagine their duty cycles and installation parameters. It will probably be someone that reads HN to bring small solutions to market :) Every little bit counts. Have a good day everyone!