I'm not the author/GP, but my immediate take here is that if you have a 100 people trying to get access to a secret string, and 5 of them succeed, then 100 peop

I'm not the author/GP, but my immediate take here is that if you have a 100 people trying to get access to a secret string, and 5 of them succeed, then 100 people now know your secret string. Once the information is leaked, it's leaked. The user safety angle is only one part of it. I think a better way of phrasing this is, "given that your secret prompt is already public and is impossible for you to secure, you might as well make it fully public within a context where it helps keep the user safe." Graph databases and observability around how social algorithms work would also benefit from transparency, but the really big difference is that it's possible to keep those things a secret. In contrast, I would suggest it's not a good business decision for any company to rely on their generated prompts as a competitive moat. What prompt you give to GPT is not a unique enough differentiator to keep your business afloat, that's too easy for other companies to replicate.