4 ms·
The article is a first-person narrative from the scientist. It's an interview. There is nothing added to its text by the tabloid apart from the introduction.
by 1gor 18y ago
The article is a first-person narrative from the scientist.
It's an interview. There is nothing added to its text by the tabloid apart from the introduction.
I cannot understand why you won't take an interview for a face value, unless you are after some sort of ad hominem effect on its contents.
- cedsav 18y agoDidn't you just made up the line "BBC fired respected scientist..."? I don't see that in the interview, and it doesn't look like he was ever an employee of the BBC (according to his wikipedia page).
- 1gor 18y agoBBC bans respected scientist for denying man-made climate change. should have been the title. Sorry, my fault.
- doodyhead 18y agoUnfortunately, I don't think it's ever possible to completely segregate an argument from its proponent. It would be nice if the world were that objective, but it's not. Intelligent design is a similar issue in my mind.