But why? Let's say North Korea nukes Seoul. Is nuking Pyongyang an appropriate response? Are the inhabitants of Pyongyang guilty of the use of Kim Jong Un's nuk

But why? Let's say North Korea nukes Seoul. Is nuking Pyongyang an appropriate response? Are the inhabitants of Pyongyang guilty of the use of Kim Jong Un's nukes? If the war in Ukraine showed us something is that for military targets precision conventional strikes are very effective. Ukraine could use more Himars, more GLSDBs, more 155 mm rounds (preferably guided), more suicide drones. And could obviously use cruise missiles. But it could not make any meaningful use of nukes. In a confrontation between North Korea and South Korea, the dominance of South Korea in conventional weaponry is absolutely jaw dropping. Any type of retaliatory response against a use of nukes that can be done with nukes can also be done with conventional precision bombs, and it could be much more directed against Kim's clique.