Well, it was interesting, but I think the AI judge fell for the same fallacy as the debating AI. Although the underlying model is impressive, it does not have a

Well, it was interesting, but I think the AI judge fell for the same fallacy as the debating AI. Although the underlying model is impressive, it does not have a real grasp of the laws of the physical world. However, the model does a good job of imitating humans, so it argued from the standpoint of a common human fallacy.