3 ms·
I don't even understand the question. It's like asking, "what can you imagine might be effective at stopping integer factorization?" Math is real. It works r
by jMyles 4y ago
I don't even understand the question. It's like asking, "what can you imagine might be effective at stopping integer factorization?"
Math is real. It works reliably. The idea that it can be "stopped" is just... I don't know - childish is the word that comes to mind.
- flangola7 4y agoI mean as in a tool that streamlines money laundering and sanctions evasion. The underlying math/science is beside the point. The service tornado cash is ran on physical hardware owned by physical human beings who can be placed in handcuffs.
- jMyles 4y ago...so, if that's the assertion (that _running an ethereum node_ is against the law), why not place those people in handcuffs? Why do this bizarre song-and-dance of writing a designation letter which passive-aggressively refers to an algorithm? There's nothing anybody can do to stop this particular piece - or any other piece - of math. And that comes as a relief to freedom-loving humans everywhere. So why pretend to make an effort to do so? Other than to decrease respect for the rule of law, what's being achieved here?
- flangola7 4y agoFission and high end radar designs are just math too. We restrict those, which is both effective and does not degrade freedom or the rule of law. Your meandering suppositions are baseless and unsupported.