> Even right out of college, I would not have purchased or rented a place in SF above ground level with no back yard, no car parking, no bike parking, and no go

> Even right out of college, I would not have purchased or rented a place in SF above ground level with no back yard, no car parking, no bike parking, and no good access to transit. Eh, ultimately doesn't seem like an issue to worry about. I'm pretty sure given the right price, there are plenty of people more than happy to overlook these inconveniences. If the developers think it makes financial sense to build as is, who are we to stop them ;-) People can adapt to all kinds of limitations as the need develops. Pretty sure if the demand for bike parking goes up, there will be people lining up to convert their car parking into bike parking for the right price. Same with public transit, if you really had 700+ voting households that are starting to demand public transportation, I would think the demand would be addressed in a reasonable timeframe.