3 ms·
I see that, but it's a matter of balance. Lots of things encourage/discourage artists, not everything will be in their favor. The way I see it, as long as nobod
by newswasboring 4y ago
I see that, but it's a matter of balance. Lots of things encourage/discourage artists, not everything will be in their favor. The way I see it, as long as nobody's work is being reproduced, they shouldn't have any real qualms.
- tjr 4y agoI think that, just as content creators can designate a work to under various Creative Commons licenses, for commercial use, or for non-commercial use, or under MIT licenses, or GPL, or proprietary licenses, etc.... We may find that letting content creators choose to have their work included, or not, in AI training sets would be helpful? Or, included in training sets for a fee, or for some sort of attribution, or ?... The apparent current status quo of "anything on the public web is fair game for an AI training set" might not be a good permanent solution?
- jacooper 4y agoThe U.S. Supreme court will rule on that hopefully soon.