6 ms·
In all seriousness, isn't https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natascha_Kampusch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natascha_Kampusch qualifying for the record?
by 11235813213455 4y ago
In all seriousness, isn't https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natascha_Kampusch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natascha_Kampusch qualifying for the record?
- valarauko 4y agoWhich record? It looks like she had contact and interaction with her captor every single day.
- qwertox 4y agoConsidering the context, no.
- capableweb 4y agoSeems the "Captivity" sections goes into more depth about why she probably doesn't hold the record: > For the first six months of her captivity, Kampusch was not allowed to leave the chamber at any time, [...] Afterward, she spent increasing amounts of time upstairs in the rest of the house, > In later years, she was seen outside in the garden alone Seems she wasn't underground for the entire duration.
- setgree 4y agoI wish I had not clicked this link
- Anthony-G 4y agoThe sibling comment, linking to the Fritzl case was even more horrifying, heart-breaking and depressing. I read one of the “See Also” links but I had to stop there. I don’t know how police, jurors, therapists, health care workers and anyone else who has to deal with these kinds of issues as part of their job deal with the vicarious trauma.
- setgree 4y agoAnd yet, both you and I fell down the rabbit hole. This kind of material is both sickening and addictive.
- mburee 4y agoWouldn't Fritzl's victims beat that by like 20 years? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritzl_case https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritzl_case Disturbingly, also Austrian...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dybber 4y ago> Fritzl, who received a life sentence, will be eligible for parole in 2023, having served the initial 15 years of his sentence Even though I’m usually against moves towards longer sentences, reading this was actually quite disturbing.
- burkaman 4y ago"Eligible" doesn't mean he'll actually be paroled, presumably some committee will have to decide if he can be released. It seems like a fine policy to allow the potential for parole while still keeping some convicts in jail if necessary.
- thaumasiotes 4y agoKeeping an 88-year-old violent criminal in jail could not be considered "necessary" by any definition other than a pure appeal to morality.
- burkaman 4y agoI don't know anything about this particular case, I'm just saying that "eligible" shouldn't be disturbing in any situation because it doesn't mean very much.
- Forgeties79 4y agoI hope you’re not really being as absolutist and handwavy of people’s concerns as you appear. There isn’t some age cut off (going up) where you are suddenly incapable of harming others. An 88 year old can commit all sorts of heinous acts.
- timcobb 4y ago> Evidence recovery was complicated, as Přiklopil's only computer was a 1980s Commodore 64, which is incompatible with modern-day data-recovery programs.[37]
- Paul-Craft 4y agoIn all seriousness, do you really want to go assigning world records like that to kidnapping victims?