5 ms·
There have to be two AIs, one examines the original and produces a description while the second examines the description and produces a new work. Neither the de
by politician 4y ago
There have to be two AIs, one examines the original and produces a description while the second examines the description and produces a new work. Neither the description nor the new work are assigned copyright because they were produced by an AI (see [1]). However, if subsequently a human then manipulates the new work, the derived work is automatically protected by copyright assigned to that person (see [1, 2]). Furthermore, the new author has a defense against a copyright infringement claim by the owner of the original based on existing case law shared previously.
This has nothing to do with gzip.
[1] https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05321/copyright-registration-guidance-works-containing-material-generated-by-artificial-intelligence https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention
- blibble 4y agono matter how many AIs you layer: it's still just a lossy compression function jpeg'ing frames of disney animation doesn't remove copyright (even if you do it twice)
- CuriouslyC 4y agoSaying a model is like jpeg compression is like saying a van is like an elephant, in that maybe if you squint so hard you're almost blind it's kinda true.
- politician 4y agoWhat matters here for copyright are the laws, not the math.